Environmental groups in Illinois are again pushing for state lawmakers to pass legislation that would ban the incineration of a toxic class of chemicals known as PFAS.
This comes after the Illinois House and Senate both unanimously passed a nearly identical bill last year, before Gov. J.B. Pritzker vetoed it.
鈥淲e thought a unanimous vote in both houses was a sign that we were on the right road,鈥� said Sonya Lunder, the Sierra Club鈥檚 senior toxics policy adviser, who was involved in the development of the bill.
PFAS refers broadly to thousands of synthetic chemicals found in common household products like nonstick cookware, waterproof clothing and stain repellent for carpet. It鈥檚 also one of the main components of many firefighting foams stored at municipal and military installations.
Pritzker ultimately vetoed the bill because of how incineration was defined. He said the bill would prohibit companies from using pollution control devices, like thermal oxidation, resulting in greenhouse gas emissions and the release of other hazardous air pollutants.
鈥� a strong carbon-fluorine bond 鈥� means the substances don鈥檛 break down and the environment. It has been linked to , and exposure can .
from concern over the Lunder said it was designed to help communities like East St. Louis and Cahokia Heights, which have been overburdened with historic pollution.
鈥淭he bill made a lot of sense,鈥� she said. 鈥淚t passed because legislators understood this was a heavily impacted community by multiple types of contamination. We shouldn鈥檛 be adding new and questionable chemicals to their community.鈥�
A spokesperson for Veolia said the company does not accept material where PFAS is identified, but notes that the chemical is common in many products and that it cannot ensure no PFAS pass through the Sauget incinerator.
Environmentalists also wanted to
鈥淲e needed to take a preemptive strike,鈥� said Nicole Saulsberry, Sierra Club鈥檚 Illinois state government representative, at a recent virtual town hall.
鈥淲e wanted to take it a step further to ban PFAS incineration across the state no matter where it is.鈥�
Lunder and other environmentalists pushed for a blanket ban on burning PFAS because of their concerns that the chemicals, which are designed to resist heat, don鈥檛 fully break down from incineration.
鈥淐oncerns that have been raised by the military and by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,鈥� she said. 鈥淓PA made the recommendation in 2020 that it鈥檚 better to hold PFAS waste until better technologies are developed and validated to destroy it fully.鈥�
Lunder explained contamination can easily escape from incinerators when they experience malfunctions.
A spokesman for the Illinois Manufacturing Association said about 10 companies contacted the association saying the legislation passed last year would negatively affect their ability to control pollution. He added the association supports the intent of the bill limiting commercial incineration, while not hurting what manufacturers can do.
鈥淭here were just a lot of last-minute, behind-the-scenes conversations and attempts to weaken the bill, and it didn鈥檛 get through the process in time during the veto session,鈥� Lunder said.
There were also efforts to change the definition of PFAS to exclude newer versions of the chemicals, said Cheryl Sommer, United Congregations of Metro East president.
鈥淪ome were wanting a watered-down version that would make the bill not mean much of anything,鈥� she said.
Sommer added that she and other local residents and organizers were frustrated by the bill鈥檚 veto last year.
鈥淚t鈥檚 shameful that people living in this community don鈥檛 seem to matter, that there鈥檚 no sense of urgency to them,鈥� she said.
The legislation this year will be introduced in the coming weeks and uses a slightly narrower definition for incineration that advocates expect the governor won鈥檛 veto. State Rep. LaToya Greenwood, D-East St. Louis, sponsored and said she hopes the version this year won鈥檛 encounter much resistance.
鈥淚 hope that we鈥檙e able to do the same thing we did last year,鈥� she said. 鈥淚鈥檝e already been in conversations with my colleagues, and everyone is aware the legislation is returning for another vote.鈥�
But Sommer said the legislation will likely face strong opposition from some groups, as it did last year.
鈥淚 know the reality of what we鈥檙e up against, which is people that want to keep things business as usual,鈥� she said.
Eric Schmid covers the Metro East for 漏 2024 外网天堂 as part of the journalism grant program: , an initiative of The GroundTruth Project.
