Environmentalists in Illinois worry that having few regulations for coal-fired power plant demolitions will increase the chance for a toxic disaster when these facilities are dismantled.
Since 2009, 12 of the state鈥檚 23 remaining coal power plants have closed, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council. Five more, all owned by Vistra Energy, are set to close this decade, according to an . One of those is in Baldwin, 40 miles southeast of St. Louis.
Six others will either close some generating units or have no official retirement dates.
鈥淲e鈥檙e hitting this big transition moment; all these power plants are going to close,鈥� said Andrew Rehn, a civil engineer at Prairie Rivers Network, which works on water, land and pollution issues across Illinois. 鈥淲e just don鈥檛 have a plan, and it鈥檚 coming across the state.鈥�
The plant closures leave behind property with massive buildings and smokestacks laden with heavy metal byproducts, like mercury, arsenic and lead, from decades of burning coal. Most are still standing.
Only three plants in Illinois have seen demolition activity so far, said a spokesperson from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. They are the Pearl Generating Station north of St. Louis, the Crawford Generating Station in Chicago and, most recently, .
Loading...
Reassurances and minimal communication
because the property鈥檚 owner, Commercial Liability Partners, avoided talking with local residents and elected leaders, said Toni Oplt, chair of the Metro East Green Alliance.
Her small group of Madison County residents sent emails, made phone calls and submitted 鈥渃ontact us鈥� forms on the company鈥檚 website after first noticing the plant was being taken apart in 2019.
鈥淎fter about the fifth email, I got a response that said, 鈥榃e鈥檙e doing everything we鈥檙e supposed to do, thank you very much,鈥欌�� Oplt said. 鈥淭hey would never meet with us, they would never talk with us.鈥�
A spokesperson for Commercial Liability Partners said that the company will follow all current safety regulations for the remaining smokestack demolition and that it has stayed in contact with local and IEPA officials.
Oplt鈥檚 experience with the company appears to mirror what happened months earlier at another shuttered coal power station with a different property owner in Chicago.
In April 2020, crews contracted by Hilco Redevelopment Partners imploded a smokestack at the old Crawford Generating Station. It sent , a working-class community of about 75,000, most of whom are Mexican and Central American immigrant families.
Edith Tovar, a community organizer with the Little Village Environmental Justice Organization, recalls her group struggled to get detailed information about the demolition from Hilco and the City of Chicago.
鈥淎 lot of our departments within our city were reassuring us that all the right precautions were taken,鈥� Tovar said. 鈥淵et there were zero water tanks on site to try and diminish the cloud of dust from traveling that far.鈥�
That dust can contain toxic heavy metals, byproducts from burning coal that remain in the smokestacks and parts of coal power plant buildings even after they鈥檙e decommissioned, said Delphine Farmer, an atmospheric chemist at Colorado State University.
鈥淗eavy metals, like arsenic and lead, tend to just stick onto the surface of dust really well,鈥� she said.
A spokesperson for Hilco said federal, state and local authorities found nothing harmful in the dust that drifted offsite from the demolition.
The city problems, and the company and its partners later .
鈥淭hese are all very low fines for a disaster that they caused,鈥� Tovar said.
The company said it took responsibility for the problems with the implosion and fired the contractor and subcontractor.
The implosion in Chicago overwhelmed the Little Village organization, which was already stretched thin working to support neighborhood residents in the early weeks of pandemic lockdowns, Tovar said. After the fact, many of the organization鈥檚 questions about who would be held accountable for the demolition problems remained unanswered, she said.
鈥淲e had nothing,鈥� Tovar said. 鈥淭he City of Chicago had nothing to share with us. IEPA also had nothing to share with us.鈥�
No specific regulations for coal power plant demolitions
Oplt and Rehn saw the damage in Chicago and worried the same could happen in the Metro East or at one of Illinois鈥� other coal plants. They both individually contacted state officials, including those at IEPA, asking what regulations the state has for coal-fired power plant demolitions.
鈥淣ot once could anyone ever definitively say, 鈥楾his company will have to be accountable,鈥欌�� Oplt said. 鈥淭here really isn鈥檛 any agency, any entity who can step in and say, 鈥榊ou cannot hurt this community by your actions.鈥欌��
A spokesperson for IEPA confirmed that the state doesn鈥檛 have specific regulations for coal-fired power plant demolitions. Companies only have to alert the agency when they plan to demolish something and meet , which apply generally to demolition activities.
鈥淚f there鈥檚 no process, there鈥檚 no way for the community to know what鈥檚 going to happen,鈥� Rehn said. 鈥淎nd there isn鈥檛 any accountability put on the company.鈥�
When Oplt turned to officials in Madison County asking about rules for coal plant demolitions, the response was lackluster, she said.
鈥淭hey were often pointing us back and forth at each other,鈥� Oplt said. 鈥淭here just wasn鈥檛 accountability.鈥�
Most of Illinois鈥� remaining coal plants are in rural areas, but there are a few that are nestled in metro areas, including the Wood River Power Station, whose smokestacks are still standing. They鈥檙e set to come down this month after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers finishes evaluating how their demolition might affect nearby river levees.
All communities where these former plants still stand deserve to know they鈥檒l be safe when the old energy infrastructure is eventually demolished, Rehn said.
He added: 鈥淚t鈥檚 a transparency issue of really understanding, 鈥榃hat does this process look like? And how can people protect themselves?鈥欌��
Follow Eric on Twitter:
