Weeks after his return from a conference in Hawaii, Missouri House Speaker Dean Plocher was trying to convince legislative staff to reimburse him for the cost of his trip.
He鈥檇 filed an expense report that included $1,199.60 for a plane ticket to represent Missouri at the 2023 Uniform Law Commission conference, but he was informed he鈥檇 missed his window. The ticket was purchased in January, and it was already August 鈥� well outside the 90-day timeframe laid out in House rules to file for reimbursement.
Plocher pled his case in an Aug. 11 phone call and letter to Chief Clerk of the House Dana Miller, arguing this was official business and he鈥檇 saved taxpayer money by buying the ticket early and getting a good deal. He filed for reimbursement, he wrote, as soon as he got back to Missouri.
The House ultimately agreed to pay him the money. But as it turns out, the cost of the ticket didn鈥檛 come out of Plocher鈥檚 bank account. It came out of his campaign.
Seven months earlier, 鈥淧locher for Missouri鈥� reported paying $1,199.60 for airfare to Hawaii for the ULC conference.
A review of Plocher鈥檚 expense reports over the years, obtained in early October by The Independent through Missouri鈥檚 Sunshine Law, shows the Hawaii expense wasn鈥檛 an isolated event.
On at least nine occasions since 2018, Plocher spent campaign money on conference registration, airfare, hotels and other travel expenses, and then also sought reimbursement from the legislature.
In each instance, Plocher was required to sign a sworn statement declaring that he had used 鈥減ersonal funds鈥� to pay the expenses.
Campaign and legal experts interviewed by The Independent say an elected official is allowed to use campaign money for official business. Or, they can use personal money and then request reimbursement from the state.
But doing both could violate state and federal law.
鈥淵ou have to choose one way or the other,鈥� said Chuck Hatfield, a longtime Democratic attorney in Jefferson City. 鈥� You can鈥檛 do both. And depending on what the facts are, there could be reason to believe there was a crime.鈥�
Plocher began paying back some of the money he has received inappropriately last week, sending a letter to House administration on Friday saying he 鈥渋nadvertently sought and received reimbursements.鈥�
In an emailed statement to The Independent on Monday, Plocher said he sent the letter prior to being contacted by The Independent.
鈥淚 am in the process of completing a full review of all expenditures and will correct any additional administrative errors in the spirit of full transparency,鈥� Plocher said.
News about Plocher鈥檚 spending comes as he was already facing scrutiny 鈥� including drawing the attention of federal law enforcement 鈥� over his push to convince the House to spend $800,000 to hire a private company to manage constituent information. Nonpartisan staff in pursuit of the contract, including threatening the employment of the chief clerk.
In the fallout from the controversy, Plocher fired his chief of staff.
On Friday, the to discuss a 鈥減ersonnel inquiry.鈥� While the committee members have given no hints about the focus of the closed-door hearing, either publicly or privately, it is widely believed to be about Plocher.
Trip to Hawaii
Plocher鈥檚 actions could have violated at least three state laws.
Submitting false expense reports from the state, a class A misdemeanor. It could also be considered , a class B misdemeanor that involves knowingly submitting any written false statement.
And while it is permissible to use campaign money for official government business, campaign contributions , said Julie Allen, a former executive director of the Missouri Ethics Commission who was speaking broadly about the situation without direct knowledge of Plocher鈥檚 specific expenses.
鈥淚f someone were receiving money from their campaign committee and also seeking reimbursement from some public entity, like the House or Senate, then they are certainly getting double their actual expense,鈥� Allen said. 鈥淭hat could mean they are using campaign money for personal use.鈥�
There is a federal law that could also apply if .
Plocher鈥檚 most recent false expense report, according to the records, involves his trip to Hawaii.
On. Jan. 17, his campaign reported spending $1,199.60 for airfare to Hawaii for the ULC conference.
He first mentioned the trip in official correspondence on July 11, when he wrote to the chairman of the House accounts and administration committee advising him that he would be attending the ULC conference and would be seeking reimbursement.
He made no mention in that email of any specific costs.
On Aug. 7, after returning from the conference, Plocher formally requested that the House reimburse him for $4,862.77.
Of that total, $3,663.17 was for his seven-day stay at the Sheraton Waikiki Hotel. The remaining $1,199.60 was for his Southwest Airlines flight to Hawaii.
A few days later, legislative staff noticed a problem.
The House was not allowed to cover the nearly $400 that Plocher spent on valet parking, an administrative staffer wrote in an email to his office. And because the airfare was purchased in January it was not eligible for reimbursement.
鈥淭he airfare shows it was paid on Jan. 15, 2023,鈥� the legislative staffer wrote, 鈥渨hich is past the 90-day policy for reimbursement. He also has seven charges at $55 each for valet parking that we don鈥檛 reimburse for.鈥�
Plocher called the House clerk to make his case, and the same day wrote a letter stating that he purchased the plane ticket in January in order to get a reduced rate. He said he was unaware of the 90-day rule and wanted to be reimbursed.
In a written note on Plocher鈥檚 letter, the chief clerk instructed staff to proceed with payment.
As with all of his requests, Plocher鈥檚 expense report stated that the payments were made with 鈥減ersonal funds, for which I have not been reimbursed.鈥�
Five years of expenses
The first example of what appears to be a false report filed by Plocher dates back to 2018.
His campaign spent $431.96 on airfare with Southwest Airlines in July of that year. Plocher requested the House repay him $112.36 for a portion of the airfare to the National Council of Legislators from Gaming States that wasn鈥檛 covered through a scholarship offered by the organization.
That same month, Plocher鈥檚 campaign spent $206.05 on 鈥渓odging鈥� at a Hyatt hotel. A few weeks later, he requested the House reimburse him $206.05 for accommodations at the Hyatt Regency St. Louis at the Arch for the Southern Legislative Conference.
His campaign also paid the $300 registration fee for the Southern Legislative Conference, and Plocher was later reimbursed by the House.
In July 2019, Plocher鈥檚 campaign reported spending $603.95 on 鈥淯LC conference rental car鈥� and $1,923.36 on 鈥淯LC conference lodging.鈥�
A month later, he was reimbursed by the House for $603.95 for the rental car. A portion of his lodging was covered by a scholarship, so Plocher only requested the remaining portion 鈥� $216.95 鈥� be reimbursed by the House.
His campaign also picked up the $600 registration fee for the ULC conference that year, and Plocher was also reimbursed for that cost.
In June 2022, Plocher was approved by the House to be reimbursed $945 for five nights at a hotel to attend a conference in Philadelphia.
A month later, his campaign spent $963.65 for a hotel in Philadelphia for what was described on the disclosure form as a 鈥渃ampaign conference.鈥� Plocher was reimbursed by the House in August for his stay at the Loews Hotel Philadelphia.
In January of this year, Plocher submitted a notice to the House asking permission to spend $325 to pay the registration to the State Legislative Leaders Foundation conference in Washington, D.C.
A week later, his campaign paid the $325 registration fee, and a week after that he was reimbursed for the cost by the House.
This story was originally published by the , part of the States Newsroom.
