The U.S. Senate voted narrowly Thursday in favor of expanding a program that compensates Americans who become ill because of exposure to radiation from the country鈥檚 development and testing of nuclear weapons to cover Missourians.
The proposal, offered by , was attached as an amendment to the , which authorizes funding levels and sets policy for the Department of Defense. The bill itself still faces a Senate vote and agreement by the U.S. House of Representatives.
鈥淚t is about basic justice 鈥� compensating the victims of the federal government鈥檚 negligence,鈥� Hawley, a Missouri Republican, said on the Senate floor.
The Senate vote comes on the heels of a six-month investigation by The Missouri Independent, MuckRock and The Associated Press, which found that or failed to fully investigate the extent of the contamination from the development of the first atomic bomb.
鈥淭his is nothing short of a miracle,鈥� said Dawn Chapman, co-founder of Just Moms STL, which has advocated for cleanup of nuclear waste for a decade. Chapman lauded Hawley during a press call following the vote.
The St. Louis region was pivotal to the development of the bomb during World War II. Workers in downtown St. Louis processed uranium that was used in the first sustained nuclear reaction in Chicago, a major breakthrough of the Manhattan Project.
The development of the bomb still casts a shadow over the region almost 80 years later. Radioactive waste contaminated public lakes and creeks where residents fish and swim. It and park land. Several sites in St. Louis County still aren鈥檛 cleaned up.
Decades later, many St. Louis-area residents believe the radioactive waste is to blame for their rare cancers and autoimmune disorders.
鈥淔or decades 鈥� decades 鈥� they told the people of St. Louis, 鈥楴o problem. There鈥檚 no problem here,鈥欌�� Hawley said. 鈥淢eanwhile, children were dying of cancer.鈥�
The program Hawley seeks to amend, the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, already covers uranium miners and millers as well as those who were onsite and some who lived downwind when nuclear weapons were tested in the Southwest.
Hawley鈥檚 amendment would expand the program to cover St. Louis-area residents who develop certain illnesses associated with radiation exposure.
It鈥檚 nearly impossible to know with certainty whether a person鈥檚 illness stems from exposure to radioactive waste. Expanding the compensation law would make residents eligible so long as they lived in the area during a particular window and developed a covered illness.
U.S. Sen. Eric Schmitt, a Missouri Republican who had yet to speak publicly on the recent reports, grew up near a contaminated site in Bridgeton and backed Hawley鈥檚 bill. He said he was proud to support the residents who had been harmed.
鈥淣othing will make them whole, but this is a step,鈥� Schmitt said.
The amendment needed 60 votes to pass. It passed 61-37 without support from Republican leadership.
Amending the act would also expand coverage, for the first time, to residents of New Mexico.
Even though the first atomic bombs were constructed in Los Alamos, New Mexico, and tested at Alamogordo Bombing Range, civilians weren鈥檛 eligible for compensation as 鈥渄ownwinders,鈥� or residents who lived downwind of the testing site. That status was granted to residents in certain parts of Arizona, Nevada and Utah.
The amendment would also expand the law to cover Colorado, Idaho, Montana and Guam and expand coverage to remaining parts of Nevada, Utah and Arizona.
Sen. Ben Ray Luj谩n, a New Mexico Democrat, cosponsored the amendment with Hawley. He asked the Senate to 鈥渟how these victims compassion, understand their pain and suffering so that they know it鈥檚 not gone unnoticed.鈥�
Luj谩n said residents with cancers, asthma and heart problems had traveled to Washington to beg the federal government to expand coverage.
鈥淎 few years ago, an elder from the Navajo Nation traveled here to testify, and she looked us all in the eye and she asked a simple question: 鈥楢re you waiting for us all to die for the problem to go away?鈥欌�� Luj谩n said.
A legacy of contamination
Following World War II, nuclear waste from uranium processing was trucked from St. Louis to surrounding counties.
For years, it sat in the open at the St. Louis airport where wind and rain dispersed it. As early as 1949, the company that refined the uranium realized highly radioactive waste sitting in deteriorated drums could pose a threat to Coldwater Creek, a tributary of the Missouri River that winds through what are now busy suburbs.
While sampling conducted for the federal government showed radioactive waste was washing into Coldwater Creek, the public wouldn鈥檛 find that out for years.
Countless St. Louis County residents grew up swimming, riding bikes and catching tadpoles in Coldwater Creek. A they now face an increased risk of cancer.
Waste was moved again from the airport to a property in Hazelwood where it continued to pollute Coldwater Creek.
And in 1973, a private company that processed the waste to extract valuable metals dumped the rest at the West Lake landfill where it remains today.
Nuclear waste also sat in the open at a plant in Weldon Spring. The buildings were demolished and buried, along with the radioactive residue, at the site. But state regulators have raised concerns over the years that the groundwater remains polluted.
The sites have come under scrutiny in recent years by environmental activists and state lawmakers.
State Rep. Tricia Byrnes, R-Wentzville, said it was 鈥渉uge to be heard鈥� after decades of inaction on St. Louis radioactive waste.
鈥淲e have a lot of parents who鈥檝e lost children. Children have lost their parents, and unfortunately, we have some families where mom, dad and all of the siblings have died,鈥� Byrnes said. 鈥淭hat is our reality. So I thank you because tonight is so amazing.鈥�
Hawley has extended invitations to U.S. Department of Energy officials to visit St. Louis, which he said has gone unanswered along with requests for additional testing for radioactive materials.
He said it鈥檚 鈥渁bsolutely sickening after what this region has been through and these folks have been through to have the government unwilling to even engage on this issue.鈥�
The amendment was adopted without support from Senate Republican leadership, meaning it could face an uphill climb for final passage. Hawley said he would have to work hard to ensure the language stays in the bill, but he said once someone learns the facts about what happened to St. Louis-area residents, it鈥檚 hard to vote no.
鈥淲e got this done against all odds today,鈥� Hawley said. 鈥淲ill there be tough lifts ahead? Yes, there will be 鈥� absolutely there will be 鈥� and I don鈥檛 downplay those for a moment.鈥�
This story was originally published by the , part of States Newsroom.
