Three St. Louis police organizations have filed a against the city to block a law expanding civilian oversight of the police.
The , which was approved by the St. Louis Board of Alderman last month and , would create the Division of Civilian Oversight. Over the next year, the civilian-led independent agency will build a team of 10 investigators to take over all internal police investigations that have to do with misconduct and use of force.
Proponents of the law said it will transform the way the city investigates allegations of police misconduct and be one of the biggest victories for police accountability since Michael Brown鈥檚 death in Ferguson made St. Louis the epicenter of the most promising civil rights movement since the 1960s.
The lawsuit 鈥� which was filed on the eighth anniversary of Brown鈥檚 death by the St. Louis Police Officers鈥� Association, the Ethical Society of Police and the St. Louis Police Leadership Organization 鈥� requests the 22nd Circuit Court to grant a preliminary injunction preventing the law from going into effect on Sept. 2.
The associations argue that the new city ordinance violates the , passed in 2000, that allows municipalities to establish civilian review boards.
鈥淰iolating Missouri state law does not promote the goals of fairness, equity and transparency that the ordinance purportedly seeks,鈥� the petition states, 鈥渁nd could result in less cooperation from police officers who lack faith and trust in the COB Ordinance and process.鈥�
The associations argue that the ordinance will grant new power to the board to discipline police, beyond what鈥檚 allowed under state law.
A spokesman for the mayor鈥檚 office declined to comment on the pending litigation, but added: 鈥淢ayor Jones has emphasized that improving public safety requires building trust between police and the community, with accountability being the foundation of that trust 鈥� especially eight years after the death of Mike Brown, Jr. and the protests in Ferguson that sparked the formation of the Civilian Oversight Board.鈥�
Since 2015, the city has had a seven-member, volunteer Civilian Oversight Board, which reviews the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department鈥檚 internal investigations into officers accused of excessive force, abuse of authority and discrimination.
However, up until last year the police department had withheld nearly all of the complaints it received against officers, leaving the board unable to fulfill its basic function, according to a with The Independent and Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting.
Longtime activist John Chasnoff, who worked with city officials during creation of the new law as well as the original 2015 legislation establishing the board, said the associations鈥� lawsuit was anticipated.
鈥�The police associations failed to bring up any issues鈥� until the bill was in final form, but they are now trying to create a narrative that doesn鈥檛 hold legal water,鈥� Chasnoff said.
Under the that gave the city local control of the police department, Chasnoff said discipline cases go through the city鈥檚 civil service commission.
鈥淭he new bill adds to the process by giving the [division鈥檚] director a say in discipline, while retaining the final authority for the civil service commission,鈥� Chasnoff said, 鈥渁nd also allowing the director of public safety to resolve any differences about what discipline should be administered.鈥�
Chasnoff said city officials took the state laws into account when writing the oversight legislation.
鈥淭he bill,鈥� he said, 鈥渨ill withstand a legal challenge here.鈥�
is part of States Newsroom, a network of news outlets supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence.
