St. Louis University, one of the first colleges in the region to resume in-person classes, tested more than 3,500 residential students for the coronavirus during move-in last week. Before classes began, 22 students tested positive for the virus, SLU President Fred Pestello said.
University officials call the initial test results encouraging. They鈥檝e altered classrooms for social distancing and have required masks on campus. But students and staff are concerned about a potential outbreak of the virus.
The university expected up to 2% of students to test positive, Pestello told students in an email Tuesday.
鈥淭hese testing results are heartening,鈥� Pestello wrote. 鈥淚t is now imperative that our students actively practice our public health safeguards. ... The COVID-19 virus spreads opportunistically from person to person, whenever people let their guard down. We have to be vigilant 鈥� each of us, all of the time.鈥�
Students who tested positive returned home or moved into quarantine housing on campus. SLU policies require students to isolate for at least 10 days, during which they can take classes online. The university has reserved 150 beds on campus for quarantine housing.
Contact tracers are working to alert students and staff members who may have come into contact with the 22 students. This could mean more students will need to quarantine.
Nine other students tested positive for the virus, but university officials said those students already 鈥渞ecovered from COVID-19.鈥� It is unclear how many students are in isolation, and a university spokesperson did not respond for comment.
Some students question how long in-person classes will last.
鈥淪tudents are not going to be able to really show up in person all the time, because inevitably they鈥檒l have to get quarantined because of contact tracing,鈥� said Anja Pogar膷i膰, a graduate student studying cognitive neuroscience. 鈥淪o I wonder if ultimately this defeats the purpose and we just should鈥檝e gone all-online.鈥�
SLU is sending students daily emails with coronavirus updates.
The University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill and have already switched to all-online instruction after starting the semester. UNC-Chapel Hill reported , and Notre Dame officials blamed off-campus parties for its surge in infections, reflected in a 19% positivity rate.
Doctors worry that the goals colleges have for in-person learning are too optimistic.
鈥淎s far as I can see, being a college student is living in a congregate setting,鈥� wrote Dr. Elvin Geng, an infectious disease professor at Washington University in St. Louis. 鈥淪o, it seems unreasonable that any congregate setting can expect to be confident they will not contribute to the epidemic.鈥�
As more people move onto campus, SLU students are worried they could become seriously sick.
School officials have been careful to put social distancing restrictions and infrastructure, like a symptoms-checking app, in place, said Elon Ptah, who works in the St. Louis University Library. But he still doesn鈥檛 trust that all students will follow the rules.
鈥淚t鈥檚 as good as it can be in the context of a global pandemic,鈥� said Ptah, who has one online class to complete before he can graduate. 鈥淸But] it all rides on the students. Maybe the administration was optimistic about that, but not many people I talk to have been.鈥�
Once parents and tour guides left last week, he started seeing students crowd together and stop wearing their masks. He鈥檚 considering quitting his job at the library so he doesn鈥檛 have to stay on campus.
鈥淚 do not at all feel safe,鈥� Ptah said. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 think most students have this community mentality.鈥�
SLU is one of the few universities in the region that has the capacity to test students on campus. The university is offering free testing to commuters, residential students and campus staff at the Student Health Center. Other colleges are relying on local health departments and clinics to test students.
Follow Sarah on Twitter:
Follow Kayla on Twitter:
